Why Brands Need To Stop Giving Away the Farm

July 31, 2012 |  by  |  Crisis Management, Twitter

Here’s how the drill works, you have a problem/issue/complaint/imagination of what a product/brand/service is suppose to do for you and it’s not. You’ve had it before, the waitress screws up your order, your cell phone company “accidentally” charges you twice, or a flight attendant jumps the line on you like Scott, (We’ll talk about that in a second). So what do you do? You ask for some sort of monetary value for their mistake for your time/effort/whatever the heck you lost. You trade the screw up for some sort of monetary apology and that makes it all better right?
Ralph screwed up  10/52

A few years ago I moved into the house I’m in now. My job allowed me to do most of my work from home which was great, expect for the fact that I had a temporary internet line running to my house that was less reliable then public transportation. In a matter of 3 months my internet didn’t work 4 times and each of those 4 times it was a minimum of 3 days before someone came to put in another temporary line. Yes, you read that correctly…instead of replacing the faulty temporary line and putting in a permanent line, they just strung up another temporary one. Each time this happened if drastically would alter my day. No longer could I work from home, so I had to leave my house. Each time this happened I would call up my provider, bitch and moan about it, get some money off my next few months, and wait until they fixed it. Never did I receive a non-scripted apology, never did they try and figure out how we could make this never happen again, never did they empathize with my situation. Finally after the 4th time I got so upset with the internet provider I called them up and cancelled all the services I had with them (internet, cable, and home phone). The $10 a month I saved from their “screw-up” wasn’t enough to hold my loyalty through crappy service. Two days after I cancelled everything they put in a permanent line (oh the irony).

You Can’t Buy Loyalty

Think about that for a second. Think about the brands you are most loyal to, why is that? Is it because they gave you a discount when they screwed up? Is it because they gave you a free meal after you found a hair in it? I doubt it, likely it is because of their behaviour, their service. It’s how they engaged with the conflictual situation. It’s how they handled a less then positive issue. It’s how they engaged with you and problem solved with you to rectify the situation.

I don’t know about you, but to me brands are giving away the farm for a return on what? Loyalty? Nah, they are just giving you something to shut you up and that’s not awesome. Let’s take a recent example of what happened to Scott Stratten (The Coles notes version):

Scott was flying out of New York when a group of flight attendants cut in front of him, without as much as an excuse me to get through airport security. After a brief exchange ending with the flight attendant telling Scott to, “Open your ears” Scott was pissed. He tweeted this:

Now this could have turned into a story for Scott’s next book (Read: Go buy the Business Book of Awesome/UnAwesome), but Delta took note (even though their name was mis-spelled) and responded:

They didn’t offer him money off his next flight, they didn’t offer free cashews on the flight, they gave him nothing of monetary value.  They simply gave him an apology, an unscripted apology.  They recognized his frustration, dealt with it in a public space, and guess what? When Scott was booking his next flight he went with Delta.

Address the Needs

I’m convinced that people are not simply looking for some monetary gain from a companies screw up.  In my situation above, I would not have cancelled everything had they simply apologized for the shitty service and up’ed their game.  Why? Because they would have better built a relationship with me had they simply had a conversation.  I would have been more understanding if they addressed my needs instead of trying to buy my silence.

 

About the author

Jason Dykstra is a Conflict Management Specialist who specializes in relational conflict. He's in the business of helping people, brands, and organizations turn conflict situations into creative solutions. Don't believe it? Ask him on Twitter, LinkedIn or onFacebook

  • http://www.facebook.com/amandacwood Amanda Wood

    Hey Jason, I felt the urge to comment because I recently had a nightmarish experience with Delta (http://ow.ly/cGA2L ). I blogged about it, tweeted it, even tweeted at them and I never heard a single apology. They never reached out to me, in fact I didn’t hear any response until I took the time to email customer support and finally ended up with a $100 voucher, which I’ll never use because I’ll never ever fly Delta again. I totally agree that brands don’t need to “give the farm away”. Had Delta been courteous and friendly through my experience I would not have been upset. What was upsetting was that no one even cared to offer sympathy or a smile. Had they taken small steps to be better at customer service I wouldn’t need the $100 voucher. Another thing that’s upsetting to me about these posts and about Scott’s post as well is that he has such a wide audience and loyal followers who are now totally in love with Delta, when the truth is Delta reached out to Scott because he has millions of followers in comparison to my 900. I’ve tweeted at them and they never respond, I guarantee they check follower count and see if it’s worth their time. In summary I agree, brands don’t need big expensive apologies they need to make small efforts to make customer experience better the whole way and if they don’t they need to acknowledge that they didn’t, however I think Delta is the wrong brand to be praising. After checking their Facebook and Twitter pages it’s clear that thousands of customer’s are having experiences like mine and Scott’s and unless you’ve got millions of followers, they don’t care.

    • http://www.absolutionmediation.ca Jason Dykstra

      hey Amanda, thanks for the comment and sorry to hear about your experience. I know that brands look at various things to identify influencers and such, mainly because they got some many comments that it would be extremely difficult to respond to all the comments they get.

      I also think it’s important to remember that though we are tweeting, facebooking, blogging at a brand, there are still people behind those screens that are dealing with the comments that come in (as best they can). True, often they can pick the wrong people or ignore a comment that they should have responded to, it’s a new(ish) thing for brands to even be able to respond to customers this way.

      I’m not proposing that people fly with Delta, I’m giving praise to that specific situation. I don’t think it’s possible to fully promote any brand that way because for every person’s positive experience there is usually an equally negative experience for another.

      There’s a learning curve that’s happening for brands, they are learning how to be human. Not an easy task, but definitely they need to work first on their listening skills and what it means to listen!

    • Chantal

      That’s an interesting and valid point. I’ve had that experience with other brands vs a high profile blogger who got instant response.

  • Pingback: Weekly Wrap Up 10th August 2012

  • Pingback: No Such Thing As Negative Publicity? | Social Medi8r